#Elasticsearch with Ruby on Rails

[rorbitssoftware]

Elasticsearch with Ruby on Rails: Enhanced Search Capabilities

Integrating Elasticsearch with Ruby on Rails can significantly boost your application's search capabilities, providing fast and scalable search functionality. By leveraging Elasticsearch, you can enhance the user experience with real-time, advanced query options, allowing users to quickly and efficiently find the information they need. This integration not only improves search performance but also offers a robust solution for handling large volumes of data, making your application more responsive and user-friendly.

[aitoolswhitehattoolbox]

Frontend Engineer

and innovative ideas. Our tech stack is React/Redux/NodeJS on the frontend, Ruby/Ruby on Rails/MongoDB/Elasticsearch on the backend… Apply Now

[strengthofmayhem]

it’s weird ao3 isn’t paying their volunteer developers

[kofigroup]

We're representing a full-stack engineer who built an ElasticSearch index to consume update events from various SQL tables that provide sales users with near real-time and fast searching across various product funnels

[rubyonrailsreact]

Hi, My name is Nhut Nguyen.

I develop a social network website like Facebook, Twitter and Linkedin with ruby on rails from scratch. I have 7 years of experiences in my startup, social sharing e-commerce.

Why you choose me

Worked remote for The United States USA clients since 2011

Bachelor's degree from Vietnam national university, fluent in English

Front end back end microservices architectures

Full stack developer leader 14 +years experience in website development

Full lifecycle development

Write clean secure efficient maintainable code

Worked for Japan Singapore companies in Vietnam

Confidentiality trust

How it works

High quality, write all test scripts, use Front end Back end and Microservices Architectures

Update last versions

Frontend

ReactJS React.js 2+ years

Redux 2+ years

HTML

JavaScript

TypeScript

CSS

Bootstrap

Material UI

Backend

Ruby 7+ years

Rails API Ruby on Rails RoR 7+ years

Rest API

JRuby

Elixir

Phoenix

Ejabberd

Test

RSpec

Jest

Enzyme

Test Driven Development TDD

Behavior Driven Development BDD

Database

SQL

MongoDB NoSQL

PostgreSQL

MySQL

Elasticsearch

Operating System

Ubuntu Linux

Tool

Github

AWS

Heroku

Agile

Scrum

[ericvanderburg]

Building Powerful Search Functionality with Elasticsearch Integration in Ruby on Rails

http://dlvr.it/SqzYpg

[vtiya]

What Is The Technology Stack That Will Be Used To Build The Super App?

The technology stack for building a "super app" would depend on the specific requirements and goals of the project. However, a typical technology stack for a complex and large-scale app may include:

Front-end: React Native, Flutter, or Ionic for cross-platform development, or native technologies such as Swift for iOS or Java for Android.

Back-end: Node.js, Ruby on Rails, or Python with serverless technologies such as AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions.

Database: NoSQL databases such as MongoDB, Cassandra, or Amazon DynamoDB for scalability and performance.

Server: Cloud-based servers such as AWS EC2, Google Cloud Engine, or Heroku for reliability and scalability.

Deployment: Containers with Docker or Kubernetes for deployment and scaling.

Additionally, technologies such as GraphQL, Redis, and Elasticsearch may also be utilized for improved performance and efficient data management. The specific technology stack will depend on the needs of the super app and the expertise of the development team.

These are the most important technology stack for super app development.

[jobsine]

Senior Azure Cloud Engineer Job For 5-8 Year Exp In Trigent Software Limited Bengaluru / Bangalore - 3751990

Senior Azure Cloud Engineer Job For 5-8 Year Exp In Trigent Software Limited Bengaluru / Bangalore – 3751990

OUR TECH STACK: • Docker, Kubernetes, Helm • Terraform, GitOps, Flux • Microsoft Azure Cloud • Datadog, Grafana, Prometheus, and New Relic • Managed Postgres and Elasticsearch • DotNetCore and Ruby on Rails back-ends • React/Redux with TypeScript fro Bengaluru / Bangalore , Hyderabad / Secunderabad 6 – 16 Years Source link Apply Now #Senior #Azure #Cloud #Engineer #Job #Year #Exp #Trigent…

[rorbitssoftware]

Elasticsearch with Ruby on Rails: Enhanced Search Capabilities

Integrating Elasticsearch with Ruby on Rails can significantly boost your application's search capabilities, providing fast and scalable search functionality. By leveraging Elasticsearch, you can enhance the user experience with real-time, advanced query options, allowing users to quickly and efficiently find the information they need. This integration not only improves search performance but also offers a robust solution for handling large volumes of data, making your application more responsive and user-friendly.

[devops-jobs]

HIRING: Principal Cloud Architect / Boston, MA

[workfromhomeyoutuber]

HocNest: Remote Contract Senior Rails / React

Headquarters: Fort Lauderdale URL: http://hocnest.com

We are looking for a senior full stack engineer with Ruby on Rails and React experience to join our team. HocNest is based out of South Florida (Miami / Fort Lauderdale). However, the entire company is distributed. We believe team members should spend less time commuting and more time with their families.  HocNest is a product studio specializing in full-stack engineering, design, and product strategy.  We partner with startups and corporations to help them deliver scalable solutions. We also build and launch our own products. This is a contract opportunity that can be worked part-time. If you are only interested in FT but you think you'd be a great fit, please still reach out!

Qualifications - Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science, MIS/CIS or equivalent work experience - 6+ years of professional Ruby on Rails experience - 2+ years of React experience - Advanced skills in SQL and database design - Proficiency in: JavaScript, React, React/Redux 

Nice to have's - Experience with Elasticsearch, AMQP, Redis - Cross platform mobile development with React Native - Experience with Docker in production environments.  We are accepting applications until May 4th. All submissions before the deadline are evaluated equally. 

Please apply via email at jobs@hocnest.com. Send us your resume and include anything else you think we should see.  Please, No Agencies. Job Types: Part-time, Contract

To apply: jobs@hocnest.com

from We Work Remotely: Remote jobs in design, programming, marketing and more https://ift.tt/34J8RgC from Work From Home YouTuber Job Board Blog https://ift.tt/2KbUUhE

[rubyonrailsreact]

Hi, My name is Nhut Nguyen.

I develop a website with ruby on rails from scratch.

Why you choose me

7 years of experience in my startup social eCommerce

Worked remote for The United States USA clients since 2011

Bachelor's degree from Vietnam national university, fluent in English

Front end back end microservices architectures

Full stack developer leader 14 +years experience in website development

Full lifecycle development

Write clean secure efficient maintainable code

Worked for Japan Singapore companies in Vietnam

Confidentiality trust

How it works

High quality, write all test scripts, use Front end Back end and Microservices Architectures

Update last versions

Full time 40+ hours per week

Frontend

ReactJS React.js 2+ years

Redux 2+ years

HTML

JavaScript

TypeScript

CSS

Bootstrap

Material UI

Backend

Ruby 7+ years

Rails API Ruby on Rails RoR 7+ years

Rest API

JRuby

Elixir

Phoenix

Ejabberd

Test

RSpec

Jest

Enzyme

Test Driven Development TDD

Behavior Driven Development BDD

Database

SQL

MongoDB NoSQL

PostgreSQL

MySQL

Elasticsearch

Operating System

Ubuntu Linux

Tool

Github

AWS

Heroku

Agile

Scrum

Services

Live chat streaming message eCommerce social networks e-learning healthcare game

[mega-michelle-world-blog]

[masaa-ma]

RedditのようなコミュニティWebアプリを構築する為のOSS・「RoRdit」

from http://kachibito.net/useful-resource/rordit

RoRdit

RoRditはHacker NewsやRedditのようなコミュニティWebアプリをを構築するためのソフトウェアです。1つのリンク先についての議論スレッドが作られる、みたいなの。バックエンドはRuby on Rails、フロントエンドはVue.jsが使われており、DBはPostgreSQL、検索にはElasticsearchが使われているそうです。動作サンプルを見る限るではRedditクローンという印象です。が、ロゴにRedditのロゴがそのまま使われているのは大丈夫なんでしょうか・・本ソフトウェアのライセンスはMITとなっています。

RoRdit

http://kachibito.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/reddit01.jpg

[un-enfant-immature]

Commons Clause stops open-source abuse

Salil Deshpande Contributor

Salil Deshpande serves as the managing director of Bain Capital Ventures. He focuses on infrastructure software and open source.

More posts by this contributor

After the Satoshi Roundtable, is there a way to bridge the bitcoin divide?

The Holy Grail of Web Scale

There’s a dark cloud on the horizon. The behavior of cloud infrastructure providers, such as Amazon, threatens the viability of open source.

During 13 years as a venture investor, I have invested in the companies behind many open-source projects:

Spring

Mule

Ruby Rails

Groovy

Grails

Maven

Gradle

Redis

SysDig

Hazelcast

Akka

Scala

Cassandra

Spinnaker

and others.

Open source has served society, and open-source business models have been successful and lucrative. Life was good.

Amazon’s behavior

I admire Amazon’s execution. In the venture business we are used to the large software incumbents (such as IBM, Oracle, HP, Compuware, CA, EMC, VMware, Citrix and others) being primarily big sales and distribution channels, which need to acquire innovation (i.e. startups) to feed their channel. Not Amazon. In July 2015, The Wall Street Journal quoted me as saying, “Amazon executes too well, almost like a startup. This is scary for everyone in the ecosystem.” That month, I wrote Fear The Amazon Juggernaut on investor site Seeking Alpha. AMZN is up 400 percent since I wrote that article. (I own AMZN indirectly.)

But to anyone other than its customers, Amazon is not a warm and fuzzy company. Numerous articles have detailed its bruising and cutthroat culture. Why would its use of open source be any different?

Go to Amazon Web Services (AWS) and hover over the Products menu at the top. You will see numerous open-source projects that Amazon did not create, but runs as-a-service. These provide Amazon with billions of dollars of revenue per year.

For example, Amazon takes Redis (the most loved database in StackOverflow’s developer survey), gives very little back, and runs it as a service, re-branded as AWS Elasticache. Many other popular open-source projects including, Elasticsearch, Kafka, Postgres, MySQL, Docker, Hadoop, Spark and more, have similarly been taken and offered as AWS products.

To be clear, this is not illegal. But we think it is wrong, and not conducive to sustainable open-source communities.

Commons Clause

In early 2018, I gathered together creators, CEOs or chief counsels of two dozen at-scale open-source companies, some of them public, to talk about what to do. In March I spoke to GeekWire about this effort. After a lot of constructive discussion the group decided that rather than beat around the bush with mixing and matching open-source licenses to discourage such behavior, we should create a straightforward clause that prohibits the behavior. We engaged respected open-source lawyer Heather Meeker to draft this clause.

In August 2018 Redis Labs announced their decision to add this rider (i.e. one additional paragraph) known as the Commons Clause to their liberal open-source license for certain add-on modules. Redis itself would remain on the permissive BSD license  —  nothing had changed with Redis itself! But the Redis Labs add-on modules will include the Commons Clause rider, which makes the source code available, without the ability to “sell” the modules, where “sell” includes offering them as a commercial service. The goal is to explicitly prevent the bad behavior of cloud infrastructure providers.

Anybody else, including enterprises like General Motors or General Electric, can still do all the things they used to be able to do with the software, even with Commons Clause applied to it. They can view and modify the source code and submit pull-requests to get their modifications into the product. They can even offer the software as-a-service internally for employees. What Commons Clause prevents is the running of a commercial service with somebody else’s open-source software in the manner that cloud infrastructure providers do.

This announcement has  — unsurprisingly, knowing the open-source community  — prompted spirited responses, both favorable and critical. At the risk of oversimplifying: those in favor view this as a logical and positive evolution in open-source licensing that allows open-source companies to run viable businesses while investing in open-source projects. Michael DeHaan, creator of Ansible, in Why Open Source Needs New Licenses, put one part particularly well:

We see people running open source “foundations” and web sites that are essentially talking heads, spewing political arguments about the definition of “open source” as described by something called “The Open Source Initiative”, which contains various names which have attained some level of popularity or following. They attempt to state that such a license where the source code is freely available, but use cases are limited, are “not open source”. Unfortunately, that ship has sailed.

Those neutral or against point out that the Commons Clause makes software not open source, which is accurate, and that making parts of the code base proprietary is against the ethos of open source; and Redis Labs must be desperate and having trouble making money.

First, do not worry about Redis Labs. The company is doing very, very well. And Redis is stronger, more loved and more BSD than ever before.

More importantly, we think it is time to reexamine the ethos of open source in today’s environment. When open source became popular, it was designed for practitioners to experiment with and build on, while contributing back to the community. No company was providing infrastructure as a service. No company was taking an open-source project, re-branding it, running it as a service, keeping the profits and giving very little back.

Our view is that open-source software was never intended for cloud infrastructure companies to take and sell. That is not the original ethos of open source. Commons Clause is reviving the original ethos of open source. Academics, hobbyists or developers wishing to use a popular open-source project to power a component of their application can still do so. But if you want to take substantially the same software that someone else has built, and offer it as a service, for your own profit, that’s not in the spirit of the open-source community.

As it turns out in the case of the Commons Clause, that can make the source code not technically open source. But that is something we must live with, to preserve the original ethos.

Apache + Commons Clause

Redis Labs released certain add-on modules as Apache + Commons Clause. Redis Labs made amply clear that the application of Commons Clause made them not open source, and that Redis itself remains open source and BSD-licensed.

Some rabid open-source wonks accused Redis Labs of trying to trick the community into thinking that modules were open source, because they used the word “Apache.” (They were reported to be foaming at the mouth while making these accusations, but in fairness it could have been just drool.)

There’s no trick. The Commons Clause is a rider that is to be attached to any permissive open-source license. Because various open-source projects use various open-source licenses, when releasing software using Commons Clause, one must specify to which underlying permissive open-source license one is attaching Commons Clause.

Why not AGPL?

There are two key reasons to not use AGPL in this scenario, an open-source license that says that you must release to the public any modifications you make when you run AGPL-licensed code as a service.

First, AGPL makes it inconvenient but does not prevent cloud infrastructure providers from engaging in the abusive behavior described above. It simply says that they must release any modifications they make while engaging in such behavior. Second, AGPL contains language about software patents that is unnecessary and disliked by a number of enterprises.

Many of our portfolio companies with AGPL projects have received requests from large enterprises to move to a more permissive license, since the use of AGPL is against their company’s policy.

Balance

Cloud infrastructure providers are not bad guys or acting with bad intentions. Open source has always been a balancing act. Many of us believe in our customers and peers seeing our source code, making improvements and sharing back. It’s always a leap of faith to distribute one’s work product for free and to trust that you’ll be able to put food on the table. Sometimes, with some projects, a natural balance occurs without much deliberate effort. But at other times, the natural balance does not occur: We are seeing this more and more with infrastructure open source, especially as cloud infrastructure providers seek to differentiate by moving up the stack from commodity compute and storage to higher level infrastructure services.

Revisions

The Commons Clause as of this writing is at version 1.0. There will be revisions and tweaks in the future to ensure that Commons Clause implements its goals. We’d love your input.

Differences of opinion on Commons Clause that we have seen expressed so far are essentially differences of philosophy. Much criticism has come from open-source wonks who are not in the business of making money with software. They have a different philosophy, but that is not surprising, because their job is to be political activists, not build value in companies.

Some have misconstrued that it prevents people from offering maintenance, support or professional services. This is a misreading of the language. Some have claimed that it conflicts with AGPL. Commons Clause is intended to be used with open-source licenses that are more permissive than AGPL, so that AGPL does not have to be used! Still, even with AGPL, few users of an author’s work would deem it prudent to simply disregard an author’s statement of intent to apply Commons Clause.

Protecting open source 

Some open-source stakeholders are confused. Whose side should they be on? Commons Clause is new, and we expected debate. The people behind this initiative are committed open-source advocates, and our intent is to protect open source from an existential threat. We hope others will rally to the cause, so that open-source companies can make money, open source can be viable and open-source developers can get paid for their contributions.